And junk
Archive for the ‘Political’ Category
Prop 8 Video 11-06-08
Friday, November 7th, 2008Why Proposition 8 will fail
Thursday, November 6th, 2008Let me start off by saying that I respect the democratic process. I also respect the system of checks and balances we have in this country, which keeps the will of the majority from imposing itself on those in the minority.
I also don’t feel that religious views should be legislated. This is a country where freedom of religion reigns supreme, and why should all be required to follow laws that are specific to a few religions. You don’t respect our country, if you don’t respect the fact that different religious views are allowed.
Want to argue tradition and you’re in bed with racists and people against women’s rights.
Lastly, even if none of this makes your mind start to wonder. The California Constitution states [Art 1.S7.(b)] - A citizen or class of citizens may not be granted privileges or immunities not granted on the same terms to all citizens.
This means that you can’t do something for one set of people and not for another. If Prop 8 was added to the Constitution, the 2 parts would directly conflict with each other. Thus the reason why opponents of Prop 8 are opposing it.
Civil Unions/Domestic Partnerships are the same as Marriage….right?
Wednesday, November 5th, 2008First of all, What is Marriage? When people marry, they tend to do so for reasons of love and commitment. But marriage is also a legal status, which comes with rights and responsibilities. Marriage establishes a legal kinship between you and your spouse. It is a relationship that is recognized across cultures, countries and religions.
What is a Civil Union? Civil Unions exist in only a handful of places: Vermont, New Jersey and Connecticut. California and Oregon have domestic partnership laws that offer many of the same rights as civil unions.
Vermont civil unions were created in 2000 to provide legal protections to gays and lesbians in relationships in that state because gay marriage is not an option. The protections do not extend beyond the border of Vermont and no federal protections are included with a Civil Union. Civil Unions offer some of the same rights and responsibilities as marriage, but only on a state level.
What about Domestic partnership? Some states and municipalities have domestic partnership registries, but no domestic partnership law is the same. Some, like the recently passed
California domestic partnership law comes with many rights and responsibilities. Others, like the one in Washington offer very few benefits to the couple.
What are some of the differences between Civil Unions and Gay Marriage?
Recognition in other states: Even though each state has its own laws around marriage, if someone is married in one state and moves to another, their marriage is legally recognized. For example, Oregon marriage law applies to people 17 and over. In Washington state, the couple must be 18 to wed. However, Washington will recognize the marriage of two 17 year olds from Oregon who move there. This is not the case with Civil Unions. If someone has a Civil Union in Vermont, that union is not recognized in any other state. As a matter of fact, two states, Connecticut and Georgia, have ruled that they do not have to recognize civil unions performed in Vermont, because their states have no such legal category. As gay marriages become legal in other states, this status may change.
Dissolving a Civil Union v. Divorce:
Vermont has no residency requirement for Civil Unions. That means two people from any other state or country can come there and have a civil union ceremony. If the couple breaks up and wishes to dissolve the union, one of them must be a resident of Vermont for one year before the Civil Union can be dissolved in family court. Married couples can divorce in any state they reside, no matter where they were married.
Immigration:
A United States citizen who is married can sponsor his or her non-American spouse for immigration into this country. Those with Civil Unions have no such privilege.
Taxes:
Civil Unions are not recognized by the federal government, so couples would not be able to file joint-tax returns or be eligible for tax breaks or protections the government affords to married couples.
Benefits:
The General Accounting Office in 1997 released a list of 1,049 benefits and protections available to heterosexual married couples. These benefits range from federal benefits, such as survivor benefits through Social Security, sick leave to care for ailing partner, tax breaks, veterans benefits and insurance breaks. They also include things like family discounts, obtaining family insurance through your employer, visiting your spouse in the hospital and making medical decisions if your partner is unable to. Civil Unions protect some of these rights, but not all of them.
But can’t a lawyer set all this up for gay and lesbian couples?
No. A lawyer can set up some things like durable power of attorney, wills and medical power of attorney. There are several problems with this, however.
1. It costs thousands of dollars in legal fees. A simple marriage license, which usually costs under $100 would cover all the same rights and benefits.
2. Any of these can be challenged in court. As a matter of fact, more wills are challenged than not. In the case of wills, legal spouses always have more legal power than any other family member.
3. Marriage laws are universal. If someone’s husband or wife is injured in an accident, all you need to do is show up and say you’re his or her spouse. You will not be questioned. If you show up at the hospital with your legal paperwork, the employees may not know what to do with you. If you simply say, “He’s my husband,” you will immediately be taken to your spouse’s side.
Defense of Marriage Law
Even with lesbian and gay marriages being performed and recognized in some states, the Federal Defense of Marriage Law prohibits the federal government from recognizing gay and lesbian relationships. This puts gay and lesbian couples who are married in a legal limbo. How do they file their tax returns? Do they have to pay the tax on their partner’s health insurance? How do they fill out legal and other forms, single or married?
Creating Civil Unions creates a separate and unequal status for some of America’s citizens. The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial court ruled that creating a separate class for gay and lesbian citizens is not permissible and that is why they have voted that only marriage equals marriage. The precedent was set with Brown v. The Board of Education regarding segregation in public education. Ironically, Massachusetts marriage law went into effect on the 50th anniversary of Brown v. Board of Education.
The United States Constitution guarantees equality for all. As you can see, marriage and civil unions are not the same. Creating equal access to marriage is the only fair way to ensure equality for gay and straight couples alike.
Gleaned from about.com’s Kathy Belge.
nice.
Tuesday, November 4th, 2008Hilariously Sad
Thursday, October 30th, 2008It’s funny because it’s sad. It’s sad because the guy speaking doesn’t realize that if Hitler were alive, he’d be part of the Yes on 8 campaign. Or as some would say “Yes on H8″.
So, this may be a touchy subject for some, but I felt I needed to discuss it.
Sunday, October 19th, 2008I got annoyed because I discussed my stance about abortion tonight and felt the need to expound upon it.
I used to be strongly pro-life. Without any research I felt that a baby was a life at the moment of conception. Without any research I felt that there was no valid reason for an abortion. Without any research I felt that my religion didn’t allow any valid reason for that life to be lost.
My fellow believers had similar thoughts.
But they also tended to be pro war, pro death penalty, pro things that seemed to be in direct conflict with this need to save an innocent life.
Add to that the desire to vote for a pro life stance candidate, which includes McCain/Palin. Palin who would have it be illegal to get an abortion if you’re raped. Really? Who feels that it’s just fine to
shoot game from a helicopter. Apparently one type of cruelty is okay and a little less cruel than another.
I also find it interesting that most pro life people say that pro choice people are pro abortion. When in fact pro choice people may be just as against abortion as pro lifers. But even so, they aren’t for legislating morals, or telling a private individual what they can or cannot do with their body.
As a gay man, and having heard and experienced in recent years the impact of old laws. “Moral” laws which dictate what you are and aren’t allowed to do in your personal/sexual life. Such as laws that until recently didn’t allow certain sexual activities to go on, behind closed doors,
between consenting indivduals. “Moral” laws based on one set of morals that typically are based in one religion. So, if we legislated based on religious “morals”, how are we practicing freedom of religion? You tell me “I can’t do something because your religion says I can’t” is, or should be, an invalid stance in a country where freedom of religion is written into the constitution.
I find that in the end I believe that people should be able to do what they want with their bodies, as long as they aren’t hurting themselves or anyone else. That’s where the conflict arises, at what point life begins. I believe the current 2nd trimester is fair, since I don’t think anyone would expect a fetus 6 months developed to survive outside of the womb on it’s own for any amount of time. I dunno, and I don’t know what the reasons might be behind the need for an abortion, but who am I to say. And I think that’s the point, who should have that authority? The government? Where do we end up with that line of reasoning?
Awesome!!! Gay Marriage made legal in Connecticut
Saturday, October 11th, 2008I’m insanely happy and the fact that it cannot be appealed or voted on for a number of years makes it that much more kick ass!
My only problem was what the governor said. “The Supreme Court has spoken,” she said. “I do not believe their voice reflects the majority of the people of Connecticut. However, I am also firmly convinced that attempts to reverse this decision, either legislatively or by amending the state Constitution, will not meet with success.”
“I do not believe their voice reflects the majority of the people of Connecticut.”
I’m saddened when it seems even the governor of an entire state is clueless as to the job of the courts, especially the supreme courts.
America’s highest court, which has the final power to decide cases involving the interpretation of the U.S. Constitution, certain legal areas set forth in the Constitution (called federal questions) and federal laws. Most states also have a supreme court, which is the final arbiter of the state’s constitution and state laws.
They are there to interpret the constitution and determine whether the will of the majority protects the rights of the minority. If the majority’s opinion was reflected, then how would the minority ever get any sort of rights? You’d still have women not voting or working and slaves. I’m appalled that someone who is leading a state, doesn’t have the basics of a constitutional government down.
And before I forget, some new ads…
Thursday, October 9th, 2008…against Proposition 8, since the “Yes” side has worked so hard pushing it’s morals of lying and deceiving in order to pass it.
Nice Ad
Thursday, October 9th, 2008Much needed, and says much about mine and recent generations who aren’t taking an active roll.
